Saturday, February 25, 2012

Tentang Duit Kertas Lagi

I saw that u do not regard paper money as being haraam, but please respond to the following, in detail: Moulana Imran Hosein (who studied under Moulana Fazlur Rahman Ansari) says the following: 1. Modern paper money is a branch of riba. He gives the following reasons: A. Modern paper money is “fiat” money i.e. it is not redeemable for any precious metal (gold/silver) or other commodity. Therefore, the value assigned to it, e.g. R100, is not convertible into actual value – it can only be used to buy some other good or stored as useless paper. B. The international system of exchange rates allows certain individuals/companies/countries to devalue a currency within minutes i.e. speculatory attack on a currency. Also, exchange rates are set arbitrarily. This means that the value assigned to a paper note is constantly changing, and wealth can be created or destroyed merely by virtue of exchange rates. This facilitates the transfer of wealth from poor to rich, without any effort on the part of the rich, and paper money is a mechanism of riba. C. Paper money has no intrinsic value – value is arbitrarily assigned (unlike gold, which has historical, universal value).

Firstly, you use the word ‘proof’ in your question, yet there was no proof ever mentioned by the claimant that paper money is Haraam. By proof we mean Shar’ee proofs, not simply disadvantages. To make something Haraam one has to have Dalaa-il (sound shar’ee proofs).

We accept that paper money is not the Islamically ideal means of exchange. It definitely has its elements of deception, and has been easily manipulated by western powers to subjugate economically weaker nations. The ideal would be to deal in gold and silver, which have real and intrinsic value. Therefore it would be the duty of a true Islamic State to revert to gold and silver as the standard means of exchange, which could then be represented by paper money.

However, it does not follow that under the present circumstances it is Haraam to use paper money. Islam is a practical way of life, and the Fuqahaa (jurists) of Islam have laid down guidelines by means of which we can practice on this Deen in every age. They have explained that if any commodity becomes the means of exchange in any society, and this is the norm, then value will be attributed to that commodity based on the norm of that society. A simple example would be that in some societies in the past shells were used as the standard means of exchange. Although shells in themselves do not hold intrinsic value, since the society attributed value to it, such items may be used as a means of exchange.

The fact that paper money has been manipulated by certain powers, and they have designed their system of Riba around it, does not render paper money Haraam. It is the transaction of Riba and the act of manipulation that are Haraam, and not the currency itself. If tomorrow they design their schemes around metals, are we then going to say that dealing in metals is Haraam. Certainly not! In fact, one who is aware of the detail rules of Riba would be aware that gold and silver are more susceptible to the contract of Riba than currencies are.

On a practical level, one can understand that it would be virtually impossible to do without paper money. Now that this so called Maulana considers paper money as Haraam, one wonders what he would do if, for example, he had to go for Hajj. Does he take trunks full of coins along because paper money is Haraam. One has to be realistic.

For details on the development of paper money, and the Shar’ee rulings of its usage, refer to “Al Qadhaayah al fiqhiyyah al muaasirah” by Mufti Taqi Uthmaani Saheb. This is an excellent work on the subject.

and Allah Ta'ala Knows Best

Moulana Imraan Vawda


Kebijakan orang barat terserlah. They created money with their own system around it. A system where we can rip off others 'legally'. And which we accepted that it is supreme.

Friday, February 24, 2012

Hubungan Malaysia - Israel | Read paragraph 9


By Emanuel Shahaf

Ever since Israel signed the Oslo agreements with the Palestinians 1993, most
Muslim countries have overcome their traditional reluctance to trade with Israel
despite the ongoing conflict. To no small degree, the commercial relations that have
been established contribute to improving relations between Israel and the Muslim
world and thus will also help, in the final analysis, resolve the issue of Palestine.

If it is with Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, the UAE, Kuwait, Tunisia, Morocco,
Mauritania or Lebanon, if it is a few million Dollars with Syria, or 2 Billion USD with
Turkey, trade between Muslim countries and Israel is increasing every year.
Following is a list of the bigger partners, in addition to the Palestinians themselves
who did almost 2 Billion Dollars worth of business with Israel in 2004.

The most formidable example of flourishing trade between Israel and a Muslim
country is that of Turkey. It is probably no coincidence that commercial relations
with the first Muslim country to recognize Israel (in 1949) are the best and most
highly developed of all the relationships with the Muslim world. These close, mutually
profitable and balanced relations (total civilian trade in 2005 was close to two Billion
USD in 2005, shared pretty much evenly) include Israeli participation in large civilian
infrastructure projects in Turkey, Turkish involvement in construction projects in
Israel, and considerable Israeli investments in Turkish agriculture and industry. The
commercial ties are accompanied by well established political and military ties
(including, over the years, more than 1 Billion USD worth of Israeli defense
contracts) which have stood the test of some serious crises, including tough Israeli
actions against the Palestinians (which resulted in Turkish protests) and the rise to
power in Ankara of the Islamic AKP party of Prime Minister Erdogan which at times,
is highly critical of Israel. The relationship has reached a degree of maturity and
mutual understanding that permits each country to voice its views and criticisms
without stepping over the lines. Israel is careful not to make a topic out of Turkey's
continued, if weakening disavowal of the Armenian Genocide, a charged issue in a
Jewish nation sensitive to holocaust denials and hosting an Armenian minority, while
Turkey will not go beyond issuing, occasionally, symbolic notes of protest over
Israel's episodic mishandling of the Palestinian issue.

It is clear that the successful and mutually beneficial relations between Israel and
Turkey have encouraged some other Muslim countries in the neighborhood, notably
Egypt and Jordan, to take note and follow the same track.

The economies of Egypt and Jordan, two other Muslim countries with an embassy in
Tel-Aviv, have abundant and low cost manpower and make an excellent match for
Israel's manufacturing industries which seek to increase production and expand their
markets. International encouragement, notably strong US engagement, has helped
establish joint Israeli-Jordanian and Israeli-Egyptian Qualified Industrial Zones

(QIZs) whose products have tax-free status in the US. The QIZ idea is simple: As a
long as Jordanian QIZ products have at least 8% Israeli content (for Egyptian QIZ
products it has to be at least 11.7% ), the products can be exported tax and customs
free to the US. With Jordan, the QIZ agreement was signed in 1997 and the 11 QIZs
that have been established since then have helped catapult Jordanian exports to the
US from a paltry 15 Million USD in 1997 to 1 Billion USD (!) in 2004.
The agreement with Egypt was signed only in 2004 but the 10 QIZs that were
established there have already increased their exports to the US between 1st and
2nd quarter 2005 by 50% (QIZ exports by now amount to about half of Egypt's
exports to the US) and the trend continues. Not only have the QIZs hugely increased
exports to the US but they have also increased Jordan's and Egypt's bilateral trade
with Israel to reasonable numbers - around 250 Million USD with the former and
close to 200 Million USD with the latter for 2005.

The success of the QIZ concept in fostering bilateral trade and exports to the US has
encouraged Israel and Jordan to approach Canada and the European Union for
similar arrangements that are likely to be approved in the near future.

Malaysia, while maintaining a cold shoulder in its foreign policy and continuing to refrain from establishing diplomatic relations, nevertheless decided a long time ago that it is in its best interest to give businessmen a relatively free reign. Malaysian exports to Israel increased by almost 40% between 2003 and 2004 and 3rd quarter 2005 results show another 25% improvement over last year's results so that by years end they will top 200 Million Dollars. Imports from Israel will remain close to last year's 203 Million USD. More than 400 Million Dollars in combined direct trade isn't bad when considering Malaysia's frosty disposition towards the Jewish state. Let's not forget that there is also a fair amount of indirect trade going on - not all of Israel's more than 340 Million Dollars exports to Singapore stay there.

Indonesia, despite its avowed policy of diplomatic abstinence, has a long history of
doing business with Israel while not owning up to it publicly to prevent flak from
Arab countries (who meanwhile do thriving business with Israel themselves) and, off
course, to avoid trouble with it's own Islamist opposition movements.

All legal impediments to direct bilateral trade with Israel were removed by the Wahid
administration in 2001 and not surprisingly, exports to Israel have increased
substantially, by almost 60% between 2003 and 2004 and by another 25% by end of
3rd quarter 2005. The 2005 sum total of exports to Israel will come to around 170
Million USD while imports from Israel, which increased by 12% between 2003 and
2004 and have since then already increased by more than 25% (correct to end 3rd
quarter 2005), will nevertheless be only a very modest 13 Million USD, indicative of
the considerable difficulties Israeli exporters continue to face in Indonesia. Again, the
indirect trade via Singapore or via US subsidiaries of Israeli companies probably adds
some tens of Millions USD to the tally but the numbers are low, much too low when
considering the enormous potential.

Muslim countries that have opened up to Israel, if only with hesitation, have quickly
discovered the considerable synergies imparted by trade relations with the Jewish
state notably an often astonishing improvement in trade with the US. Those that
have established embassies or trade representations have gained the most and at a
fast pace as well.

A sustained effort to improve trade relations between Israel and Muslim countries will
not only improve the economies of the countries involved but also contribute to
better mutual understanding and help lower the considerable enmity that is still, not
infrequently part of the public discourse. Giving these developments a public profile
is in the best interest of all concerned.

Jangan terkejut kalau sape-sape perintah lepas ni, Malaysia akan ada hubungan diplomatik secara langsung terus dengan Israel. Masing-masing dah boleh buat passport baru dah pastu gi melancong ke Tel Aviv, orang Israel pulak boleh melancong ke Malaysia lepak2 kat KLCC. without written permission..

Thursday, February 23, 2012

Haram Penggunaan Wang Kertas dan Sewaktu Dengannya

GRANADA, 18th of August of 1991.

The proof of this prohibition of usury comes from the book of Allah :

"Allah has permitted trade and forbidden usury"
(Quran, 2, 275)

Allah has forbidden usury, and therefore all the transactions which fall under this category are all forbidden by Allah. Imam Malik said:

"Whatever makes a sale halal makes it halal and whatever makes a sale haram makes it haram"
("Al-Muwatta", Book of Commercial Transactions, 49)

We are going to prove, Inshaallah, that the use of paper-money makes the transaction usurious and haram and consequently we will declare that the use of paper-money is haram.

This Fatwa consist of 4 parts:

Before we enter into a proper analysis of what paper-money is, we will examine the law to undertand what Allah has made haram, namely usury, so that we will be able to identify it.

1. The Nature of Usury

Then we will examine the nature of paper money

2. What is paper-money?

Then we will arrive at a decision on the matter


And finally we will examine how can we implement the fatwa


The Nature of Usury

Usury in Arabic means increment, excess. The definition of usury by Qadi Abu Bakr Ibn al-'Arabi in his "Ahkamul'Qur'an" is:

"Usury (Riba) is any unjustified increment by its countervalue ('iwadun)"

Another form of expressing the same is:

"Usury is any unjustified increment between the value of the goods given and the countervalue of the goods received"

Definitions: What is the thing that is increased in such a usurious contract? What is increased in the usurious contract is not merely the quantity, like for example, the weight of one good against the other.We will call this caracteristic of the goods: value (qimah). Value includes the quantity and quality of the goods, and also is a reflection of a free market and it is the reflection of a just transaction. Goods ('ard) is anything containing wealth in general that can be sold or bought, including merchandises and the particial use of rentable merchandises. The value of goods is the comparative relation with some other goods in a just commercial transaction (bay'). Value is each one of the two relations between two equivalent parts:

The value of A is B: A=B

The value of B is A: B=A


Note for people miseducated in a Faculty of Economics:

The kafirs speak of value as a subjective/objective representation. Value is sometimes represented by a concept of subjective utility (Galiani), sometimes by objective labor (Smith, Ricardo), sometimes represented by abstract labor (Marx), sometimes by numerical data (Samuelson). Value is not something psychical, is not a concept. To evaluate is a human act, and an act only exists in its performance. Evaluation exists only in the instant when two parties exchange goods within certain existential conditions that make the exchange equivalent. And these conditions are the matter of Islamic Jurisprudence.


We warn all Muslims against the spread of the kafir doctrines of Karl Marx among ourselves, sometimes through the influence of munafiqun and ignorant people. Karl Marx was a Jew of a very important rabbinical family in Germany. The core and basis of his doctrine is called: the doctrine of surplusvalue (Mehrwert, in the original German), which for Marx was like robbery. Surplusvalue could literally be translated in Arabic (a semitic language like hebrew) as Riba. Usury comes from latin. Surplusvalue is a literal translation of the semitic word which means usury. If we realise that surplusvalue 'means' usury, we can see how Marx then twisted the meaning. Where we say making profit in one transaction is usury, he said it is not usury (surplusvalue) and is acceptable (halal). And where we say making profit in between two transaction is trade and is halal, he said is usury (surplusvalue) and is unacceptable (haram). Marx twisted the meaning of usury to its opposite.


What is paper-money?

What we know today as paper money is the result of an historical evolution. And it is still evolving*. Paper money in history has passed through different stages, in which paper-money has adopted different natures therefore has been understood in different ways.


Paper money is a creation of the Kufr of the West and it is not the creation of Islam. It was then introduce in the Muslim land through the colonial and intellectual pressure of the kafirs, and the colaboration of some munafikun.

In the European Middle Ages money consisted of gold and silver, although generally altered by the kings. The use of paper money is already recorded, though limitedly in its use, between merchants and bankers in Italy in the XI century, and later on in Naples, Sweden, Cologne, Vienna or Granada from the XV century right up to the short attempts or experiments with paper money that happened in France during the XVIII century (John Law in 1720). This original use of paper-money must be distinguished from the use of paper money in the new country called United States, when a significant and fundamental change happened in the use of paper money: Paper money, the dollar, became the generalised and lasting medium of exchange. A third period must be distinguished after World War II when paper-money gradually became what it is today: a monopolised merchandise standing on its own, not representing other particular merchandise.



The establishment of the Bank of England had originated a new situation in relation to paper money. The bank created by Patterson had 72,000 pounds in gold and they lent 16.75 times more to the king of England (William of Orange) to finance his war against France. He lent the money at an annual interest of 8.25% so that it received 100,000 pounds a year of interest. Although he had only 72,000 pounds he received an interest of 100,000 a year, therefore, about 140% a year. When some people started to rumour that the Bank had not enough gold for all the receipts, the state, who needed them to finance the war, declared them legal money of the kingdom. By law the receipts had the same value as the gold that they represented. The debt became legal medium of exchange. The example was repeated successfully in other countries, until it reached its peak with the constitutional establishment of legal paper-money in U.S.A.


On the trading generally with receipts (debt):

The trading generally with debts, without being contained to particular cases, is usury and haram

Zayd ibn Thabit, one of the Companions of the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, made haram the trading with receipts. He said it is usury.

Yahya related to me from Malik that he had heard that receipts were given to people in the time of Marwan ibn al-Hakm for the produce of the market at al-Jar. People bought and sold the receipts among themselves before they took delivery of the goods. Zayd ibn Thabit and one of the Companions of the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, went to Marwan ibn al-Hakam and said, "Marwan! Do you make usury halal?" He said, I seek refuge with Allah! What is that?" He said, "These receipts [sukuukun] which people buy and sell before they take delivery of the goods." Marwan therefore sent guards to follow them and to take them from people's hands and return them to their owners.

("Al-Muwatta", Book of Commercial Transactions, 44)


Paper-money as a debt cannot be used as a medium of exchange. A debt is restricted to a private contract between two parts, and it should remain like that.

The general use of a debt in the exchanges is in most of the cases haram, and it is in general disapproved. It is only limitedly allowed in a private situation. Therefore the use of a debt as a medium of exchange is haram.


After examining the nature of paper money in all possible forms: as a debt (a promise to pay a merchandise or representing a merchandise) and as a merchandise, we have seen its use makes the transaction usurious.

Paper money cannot be accepted as a medium of exchange even if it represents a merchandise gold or silver, on a nominal and one to one basis. Even if that were the case it could not be used outside the closed circuit of depositor and receiver. Only on a private scale it can be transferred but may not circulate.

But if we consider that nowadays paper-money has become nothing but a pure symbol with no reality attached except the imposition of the law, then it is clear that the use of paper money is usury because:

- Its 'legal value' is an imposition by the state on the people and

- Its production is a limited monopoly by the same state that imposes it.

Without these two elements which are usurious conditions the value of the paper-money would be nothing.

Therefore we declare a Fatwa in Granada, for all the Muslims, by which:

After examining all the aspects of paper-money, in the Light of the Qur'an and the Sunna, we declare that the use of paper-money in any form of exchange is usury and is therefore haram. It is not permitted for the Muslim to accept or to give paper-money in a commercial transaction. It is an obligation on the Muslims to abandon usury and to introduce new media of exchange, or money, and the best way is to follow the sunna of the Messenger of Allah, salallau alaihi wa salaam, by using gold and silver, or any other merchandise commonly accepted as a medium of exchange.


"The use of paper-money in any form of exchange is usury and is therefore haram". This fatwa obliges all the Muslims to abandon the practice of usury in the form of using paper money as the medium of exchange. The understanding of this fatwa should not lead to the conclusion that therefore I can not take a taxi back home because I will have to pay the taxidriver with paper-money. This way of thinking is mockery with the intention of preventing you from doing anything serious about it. What one should understand is that money is not a personal matter, but it is common agreement among people. What one should do is to create an arena of people where you can agree to accept a different medium of exchange. This is a decision for a group, not a matter for a single individual.

We must understand that the introduction of paper-money as a medium of exchange among the Muslims has been a process of 200 years. We must understand that we have modelled and fashioned our ways of trading and our ways of living around the existence of paper-money. All this must change in order to be able to avoid the haram.


The "Islamic Bank" is a completely usurious institution used as a means to lure the Muslim who still reject the banks to enter in the banking system. The "Islamic Bank" is a Trojan horse in Dar al-Islam.

Note: a warning against the Modernist Movement and the allowance of usury

The inspiration behind the Modernist Movement is said to have been Jamal-ud-Din al Afgani (1839-1897), its brain was Muhammad 'Abdou (1845-1905) and the one who extended it was Rashid Reda (1865-1935). It appeared as a rejection of the colonialism, but their emotional rejection of the West was accompanied by a deep and not discriminated admiration of the West. This movement is responsible for the introduction of a false teaching that said banking and insurance transactions are not usury and are allowed in our Muslim community.

Muhammad 'Abdou because of his position - he was posted as Shaykh (Director) of the renowned University of Al-Azhar by Lord Cromer, Brithish Governor of Egypt - was the most damaging of all. His first fatwa as Shaykh al-Azhar was: "interest in saving funds is allowed". He wrote (5th of Dec. of 1903):

"The stipulated usury is not permisible in any case; whereas the Post Office invest monies taken from the people, which are not taken as loans based on need, it would be possible to apply the investment of such monies on the rules of a partnership in commendan"

("Al-Manar", vol. VI, part 18, pag. 717)

The door to the using of the banks and their banking money was therefore opened. The basis of the "Islamic Bank" had also been delineated by which the interest can be considered as if it were part of parnership in qirad.

Muhammad Rashid Reda was the founder of the magazine "Al-Manar" distributed around all the Muslim World. He participated in the same circle of people as Lord Cromer and 'Abdou. He opposed the traditional position of the Madhhabs to impose his own opinions. He also bitterly opposed the traditional Sufis. His opinions are clearly exposed in his writing:

"There is nothing in our religion which is incompatible with the current civilisation, especially those aspects regarded as useful by all civilised nations, except with regard to a few questions of usury [riba] and I am ready to sanction [from the point of view of the Shari'a] everything that the experience of the Europeans before us shows to be needed for the progress of the state in terms of the true Islam. But I must not confine myself to a school of law, only the Qur'an and the authentic Hadith" ("Al-Manar", vol. XII, p.239)

"Except with regard to a few questions of usury [riba]" What he meant by a "few questions" is for example that he saw nothing wrong with taking up a life insurance policy ("Al-Manar", vol. XXVII, pag. 346, also vol.VII, pags. 384-8, and vol. VIII, pag. 588). He also decries the jurists' misuse of Qiyas to extend to the area of prohibition on taking interest on capital and suggests that the taking of interest on monies left in the bank or post office does not come under the prohibited usury. ("Al-Manar", vol. VII, pag. 28).

The teaching of this people or other people who use their arguments in their judgement have to be rejected. With it the restoration of the traditional fiqh that clearly forbids usury in all its forms.


Some 'practical people' pretend that you cannot leave paper-money and the banks. But to abandon usury is not impossible, it is the easiest thing possible. Allah does not imposes on any soul a duty beyond that which it can bear. Allah has commanded us to two distinctive tasks:

1. The abandoning of usury

2. Fighting against those who practice usury

Abandoning usury is also the creation of a halal way of trading among ourselves, which does not involve any form of paper-money or other usurious practice. And fighting against the usurers is to destroy the means by which they practice usury using all the methods at hand (harb). Both of them must go together, we cannot promote the destruction of the usurious system if at the same time we do not provide an alternative. Equally we will not be able to succeed in establishing an Islamic market if we do not dismantle the fragile structure of the financial and usurious nexus. This is the future fight of the Muslims.

The Creation of an Islamic Market

The Path towards the Islamic Market should be a progressive, systematic, and strategic abandoning of the usurious system.

•The first step is education. Knowledge of the basic rules of the Islamic Market: the basis of qirad, a commercial transaction, what is riba... This is essential because this knowledge is practically lost. Most of the Muslims have adopted the ways of the kafir, and have complete ignorance of how this could be done Islamically.

•Second it is obligatory take on the fard of chosing an Emir in every community of Muslims to whom all of them give oath of alliance (the bai'at). The Emir is the seal of the community, gathers the people together and pursues justice in the controversies of the community.

•Third we should start implementing strategically the Law, this could be carried out in three stages

a] Minting of coins: gold, silver, copper, or anything commonly accepted. This is for us real money. The sunna of the Messenger of Allah was to use gold and silver as the main medium of exchange

b] Establishment of Muslim Fairs or Markets. Putting the coins in circulation, among the people who will agree to keep them in circulation (and not keeping them). Thus condition of the Trade Fairs among Muslims will be to deal with the real coins and not with paper. The Market should proliferate in different communities, until we are able to establish permanent ones in every Muslim community under the authority of an Emir.


The Destruction of the Usurious System

To impose the supremacy of our deen to Kufr is an obligation for the Muslims. Allah has made Jihad fisabilillah, halal for the Muslims. To fight fisabilillah, the first condition is that the banner of Islam must be raised high, it cannot be done by secret organizations. Kufr cannot be fought with the weapons of kufr, the military struggle cannot succeed unless we stop paying a usurious tribute to the kuffar.

The first struggle against kufr, should be against their usurious (financial and monetary) system. The usurious system of money and finance is the weakest part of their system, because it is based on pure fantasy. The enourmous debts of the countries and the even bigger debt of the individual persons to the banks DOES NOT EXIST on paper. It is pure computer data. It is like a magic. As long as people believe that this system has a reality, they will find themselves prisoner of its demands and ways. The moment they realise that the wealth is in themselves and that they do not need this usurious system, the system will collapse. Collapse is the inevitable destiny of the usurious system, because Allah has declare his war against those who follow it. In the meanwhile a group of totally commited Muslims will take on their duty to use strength and wealth to spoil and to destroy the usurious system.


The events of recent History reveal that the fight against the kufr cannot yet take place in the battlefield, they are prepared for this in the most extraordinary way, that they can kill without being present. This is the kind of battle they are expecting. But our battle is global, and clearly oriented to their weakest point.

It is necessary to form small groups, with the authority of one Emir, to fulfill this obligation of the Muslims. The first step of these groups is that they must swear absolute allegiance among themselves for the purpose of the ghazwat. They must then study the best strategy to have success. And then commit themselves to the action.

About the targets the Shaykh has said:

"It should be remembered that in the early phase of the Jihad, raiding should be on targets of all who participate in the haram usurious practice, and that the jews have enhanced their power, that is, the worthless paper-money, by their own hoards of wealth, through control of the diamond and the gold markets, and that these centres of hoarded wealth are among the necessary first targets to finance the larger struggle"

("The Sign of the Sword", p. 63)

The Islamic future will inevitably target computer systems, and erase debt information of major banks all over the world. Enter into their system and transfer money at random, or to a particular accounts that we can use. Alter the information in a way that they cannot reconstruct it. To do that we are in an excellent position because all Muslim are potential mujahidin. And nowadays the Muslims, whether it is correct or incorrect, are everywhere inside the whole of the usurious system. This Muslims and their expertise are our weapons. Weapons are not tanks nowadays. Weapons are technical knowledge and people with access to information. We have all that we need within our Muslim Umma.

The computer networks are being infiltrated everyday. In many cases by young boys for the purpose of playing. This weakness is growing and growing as their greed grows. It means that a free spirit and conviction is the most powerful of all guarantees of success.

Our businessman have also a task to do. They have their own networks of people who trust, and have access to very valuable information. The only thing they have to do is stop being naive about the bank and the financial institution. They should not play the role of victims with them. Do not admit their conditions and rules, but play with them at your favour. They have to change the mentality. They should prepare themselves within their rules to take from the enemy. Create companies in a vacuum and absorb debt that will never be paid back, create different financial identities to avoid the control and taxation of the state, use everything you know to take from them and sabotage them.

These teams of truly Muslim Mujahedeen, should appear everywhere. Not only one head, but we should be many heads. As the Shaykh says:

"It follows that one should strike at the place not expected. By extension, in the light of the current situation, one may strike at several centres all at the same time, thus causing havoc in the enemy and their response."

("The Sign of the Sword", p. 63)

The election of the targets has to be ordered by their priority in relation to the total struggle against Kufr. We should not fell into the temptation of chosing those which seem easier, but rather we should chose those which are more effective against the usurious system. We should also remember that although the booty in Jihad is halal for the Muslims, this is not the purpose of the fight. The purpose is to make Kufr surrender to the deen of Islam. Therefore the first targets must be the bigger targets, even if they take longer to get organized. So that they can be delitated, and you introduce chaos in their usurious system. We should use the surprise, to hit in their key communications centers and to their key people. And once the first targets are covered we should move to the smaller ones.

We call you all Muslims with an Amir to the struggle fisabilillah against the usurious system! These are just simple examples of how things can be done. Victory is certain if we fight fisabilillah. Therefore fisabilillah must be our constant remembrance. Victory belongs to Allah.

The Book of Allah:

"Allah imposes not on any soul a duty greater than it can bear. For it gets every good that it earns, and it suffers every ill that it earns. Our Lord! Punish us not if we forget or make a mistake. Our Lord! Do not lay on us a burden as You laid on those before us. Our Lord! Lay not on us a burden greater than we have strength to bear. And pardon us! And grant us protection! And have mercy on us! You are our Protection! So grant us victory over the disbelieving people"

(Quran, 2, 286)

* It is evolving from its paper form towards an electronic form representing some hipothetical unit of money, as the universal and unique the medium of exchange.

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Regime Change | Tun M |

1. Amerika Syarikat bersama dengan negara-negara Eropah lain dan juga Israel berhajat untuk melakukan “regime change”, iaitu menukar kerajaan-kerajaan negara-negara di dunia yang tidak menyokong mereka.

2. Mereka akan melakukan “regime change” ini melalui pelbagai cara. Di Iraq mereka melaksanakan “sanction” sekatan dagangan pada mulanya dan kemudian berperang dengan Saddam Hussein untuk menukar kerajaan Iraq. Dan mereka berjaya.

3. Mereka juga cuba menukar kerajaan Iran dengan menghasut dan membantu Iraq untuk berperang dengan Iran. Usaha ini gagal. Hari ini mereka masih mencuba dengan menyekat negara-negara di dunia daripada membeli minyak Iran.

4. Perancangan dibuat untuk menukar kerajaan Syria menggunakan berbagai-bagai sekatan kewangan dan dagangan, serta membantu pemberontakan melawan Kerajaan Syria. Usaha ini sedang diteruskan.

5. Di negara-negara Arab apabila ada pemberontakan untuk menjatuhkan kerajaan, Amerika dan Eropah memberi bantuan wang dan senjata, bahkan melancarkan serangan bersenjata untuk menjatuhkan kerajaan yang tidak disukai oleh mereka.

6. Di Chile dahulu, Presiden Allende yang dipilih oleh rakyat melalui proses demokrasi, dibunuh oleh agen-agen Amerika supaya Jeneral Pinochet yang disokong oleh Amerika dapat menjadi Presiden. Amerika lebih suka seorang diktator yang ganas daripada pemimpin yang demokratik jika ianya tidak sokong Amerika.

7. Dimana-mana sahaja Amerika dan Eropah memberi bantuan mengguna media mereka untuk memburuk kerajaan tertentu supaya rakyat digerak untuk mengguling kerajaan yang tidak berbaik dengan Amerika dan Eropah.

8. Di Indonesia sokongan diberi kepada tenteranya untuk menjatuhkan Sukarno. Kemudian pelbagai jenis tekanan diguna untuk menjatuhkan Presiden Suharto.

9. Dimana sahaja kita lihat Amerika bersama Eropah dan Israel, tidak berhenti-henti mencuba menjayakan “regime change” supaya dapat mereka kuasai semua negara di dunia.

10. Apakah Malaysia tidak menjadi sasaran untuk “regime change”? Memang pun Malaysia menjadi calon untuk “regime change” kerana Malaysia tidak mengiktiraf Israel dan mengkritik beberapa dasar Amerika Syarikat.

11. Calon Amerika dan Israel untuk mendiri kerajaan boneka ialah Anwar Ibrahim. Sejak awal lagi mereka menjalin hubungan yang rapat dengan Anwar.

12. Anwar pula ternampak jelas menganggap sokongan Amerika boleh menjayakan cita-citanya untuk menjadi Perdana Menteri Malaysia. Oleh itu Anwar memberi gambaran bahawa ia adalah seorang liberal yang terima dan sokong konsep-konsep kebaratan seperti hak asasi manusia, kebebasan dalam serba-serbi, sikap anti-kroni dan rasuah kononnya, penolakan DEB yang dikatakan menindas kaum tertentu di Malaysia dan bermacam lagi yang boleh mendapat pujian dan sokongan oleh Amerika. Ia cukup berjaya kerana Amerika anggap Anwar amat layak untuk melaksanakan “regime change” di Malaysia.

13. Pelobi yang amat berkesan di Amerika ialah orang Yahudi. Ramai dari kawan-kawan Anwar di Amerika seperti Paul Wolfowitz, Cohen dan lain-lain adalah dari kumpulan neo-con yang mencipta dasar penaklukan dunia oleh Amerika (Project for the new American Century).

14. Demikian apabila Anwar dihadapkan di mahkamah kerana tuduhan liwat, mereka mengecam Malaysia kerana kononnya menghalang cita-cita Anwar untuk menjadi Perdana Menteri Malaysia. Sudah tentu jika Anwar tidak dapat menjadi Perdana Menteri maka gagallah rancangan “regime change” Amerika.

15. Tidak hairanlah kenyataan Anwar bahawa ia menyokong segala tindakan untuk keselamatan bagi Israel. Sudah tentu ini akan menarik sokongan Amerika dan media mereka. Orang Palestine tidak boleh menolong Anwar.

16. Melihat sokongan Amerika kepadanya Anwar Ibrahim adalah calon Amerika untuk melakukan “regime change” di Malaysia dengan menjadi Perdana Menteri Malaysia. Kerajaan yang ada sekarang tidak disenangi oleh Amerika kerana bersikap berkecuali, berbaik-baik dengan Cina dan Russia dan tidak menyokong sentimen Amerika terhadap Iran dan beberapa negara lain.

17. Adalah menjadi harapan Amerika, apabila “regime change” berjaya di Malaysia dan Anwar menjadi Perdana Menteri maka mungkin Malaysia akan ada hubungan diplomatik dengan Israel dan menjauhkan diri dari perjuangan Palestine. Dengan ini sebuah kerajaan boneka akan tertubuh di Malaysia yang akan sokong apa sahaja usaha Amerika untuk menakluk dunia.


P/s: Aku tak sokong mane-mane parti tapi kepada yang beragama Islam, Al-Quran and hadiths might explain everything about this topic. Syeikh Imran Hosein merupakan salah seorang specialist dalam bab-bab ni. Menggunakan Al-Quran, hadiths dan fakta sejarah, buku-buku dan ceramah beliau banyak bongkar agenda-agenda yang banyak orang tak nampak atau terlepas pandang. Sebelum mengolah konklusi, disarankan baca buku-buku beliau. Dijamin best.

Apa Sebenarnya Terjadi di Syria

Nota ini adalah hasil perkongsian tokoh ulama' syria,Syeik Hassan di UPM yang datang ke malaysia akhir tahun lepas dan menceritakan peristiwa sebenarnya yang berlaku di Syria:)Ana turut berkesempatan berada disana.


Syria merdeka dari penjajahan Perancis pada 1945, dan telah diperintah oleh anak bangsa Syria sendiri sehingga zaman Hafez Al-Assad yang telah memerintah selama 32 tahun dan diikuti oleh anaknya Basyar Al-Assad yang telah memerintah selama 11 tahun. Syria telah menjadi negara yang diperintah oleh diktator.

Hafez Al-Assad berpegang pada Syiah Nusairiyah, yang menyimpan perasaan dengki terhadap rakyatnya daripada MUSLIM SUNNI, yang mencaci dan menghina Saidina Aishah dan Ummahatul Mukminin radhiyallahu anhum, diharamkan sembelihan mereka, mereka melakukan kejahatan yang pelbagai, mereka tidak solat di masjid kita (ASWJ).

Kerajaan Syria didokong oleh Iran yang terkenal dengan Syiahnya, bahkan Hafez sendiri merupakan pelampau Syiah.

Syeikh Hassan seterusnya menceritakan tentang Syria yang mana 6 peratus darinya merupakan Syiah Alawie, 10% darinya beragama Kristian dan 84% daripada rakyatnya beragama Muslim Sunni. Iran mempertahankan tindakan ganas regim Hafez yang membunuh rakyatnya sendiri, begitu juga Hizbullah di Lubnan juga menyokong tindakan Hafez Al-Assad.

BERMULA ZAMAN AYAHNYA- Hafez Al-Assad- konflik berdarah di Hama pada tahun 1982 yang berlaku selama 27 hari mengorbankan hampir 46000 ribu penduduk Hama. Peristiwa ini menyebabkan rakyat Syria mendiamkan diri dari politik sekian lama.

Rakyat mula kembali bangkit terhadap kezaliman yang berlaku semenjak 8 bulan yang lalu.

Permulaan revolusi berlaku di Hama, kemudian merebak ke bandar-bandar lain seperti Dar'aa, Hauran, Halab bahkan sehingga ia berlaku di 157 tempat di Syria.

PUNCA KEBANGKITAN ADALAH : Ada sekumpulan kanak-kanak seramai lingkungan 28 orang bermain-main dan telah menulis sesuatu di dinding sekolah mereka. Apa yang ditulis oleh kanak-kanak ini ialah RAKYAT MAHU JATUHKAN KERAJAAN. Slogan ini telah dilaungkan di negara2 yang berlaku kebangkitan rakyat. Pasukan keselamatan Syria telah menangkap kanak-kanak ini. Mereka telah diseksa dengan cara mencabut kuku-kuku kaki dan tangan mereka. Salah seorang kanak2 itu telah meninggal dunia dan keluarganya meminta mayat kanak2 itu serta kanak2 lain dilepaskan. Kerajaan telah meletakkan syarat dimana bila mahu lepaskan kanak2 itu, mereka perlu memberi wanita2 dikalangan mereka untuk dinikahi oleh puak2 kerajaan Syria ini ( satu bentuk penghinaan), maka berlakulah kebangkitan di Syria.


1-Dalam masa 42 hari telah terbunuh Syahid seramai 4000 orang rakyat Syria.

2-39000 orang telah cedera, mereka tak dirawat dan dibiarkan sahaja.

3-Satu peristiwa di mana seramai 19 orang doktor di hospital dan 40 orang pesakit di hospital tersebut dibunuh tentera Assad di wilayah Doma.

4-9000 tahanan ditahan.

5-413 orang telah syahid di dalam penjara.

6-Wanita2 diculik dan dibawa ke tempat yang tak diketahui. Wanita ini telah dirogol di hadapan abang2, ayah, anak2, dan ahli keluarga mereka. Sebelum dirogol, mereka digari terlebih dahulu.

7-Seorang ukhti bernama Zainab Al-Husni dari Hims, di Madinah Khalid bin Al-Walid. Beliau telah ditangkap dan mahu diperkosa oleh tentera yang menangkapnya. Tetapi beliau melawan. Lantas beliau dibunuh dan telah dipotong 4 KERAT.. Anggota badan yang dikerat itu dimasukkan ke dalam plastik, lalu dicampakkan ke hadapan keluarga beliau.

8-Mengucapkan takbir merupakan sesuatu yang tidak disukai.

9-Menyuruh tukar Laa Ilaha Illah Basyar Asad.

10-Basyar Assad juga daripada kelompok Syiah yang terkeluar daripada Islam dan mengharuskan untuk membunuh Muslimin Sunni..84% daripada posisi kepimpinan Rejim Basyar Assad dipegang oleh kaum keluarga mereka yang terdiri daripada 3 keluarga besar, 6% daripada posisi tersebut pula daripada kaum Ajam dan 10% lagi daripada golongan Kuffar.. Tiada posisi bagi Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaah..Kezalimannya terhadap wanita dan kanak2 juga terlalu dahsyat melebihi Israel..rakyat2 Sunni dibunuh sesuka hati tetapi walau seorang Israel pun tidak ditumpahkan darah..hasbunallahu wa neemal wakeel..



Rabitah Ulama Syria yang diasaskan oleh Dr Ali As-Sobuni dan Rabithah Ulama Sedunia telah berfatwa kepada rakyat Syria agar mempertahankan rumah mereka daripada keganasan tentera walaupun dengan menggunakan pisau dengan berdalilkan hadis berikut;

#"Barangsiapa terbunuh mempertahankan hartanya, maka dia syahid ; barangsiapa terbunuh mempertahankan ahli keluarganya, maka dia syahid; atau mempertahankan agamanya, maka dia syahid" -hadith ini dikeluarkan oleh Abu Daud dalam Sunannya (2/275) An-Nasaie dan Tirmidzi dan disahihkan oleh Imam Al-Albaniy dan Ahmad (1652 dan 1653) dari jalan Said Bin Zaid dan sanadnya Shahih.


1-Masa depan kebangkitan ini begitu baik. ia berterusan dan semakin kukuh. Lebih 30000 tentera yang terdiri dari pegawai telah bersama rakyat. Mereka ini telah melindungi orang2 yang turun berdemo kerana tidak tahan melihat kekejaman rejim Basyar Assad ini yang sesuka hati membunuh rakyatnya sendiri.

2-Pertubuhan2 Arab (Liga Arab) telah mengambil pendirian tentang apa yang telah Syria lakukan terhadap rakyatnya. Mereka tidak membenarkan pegawai2 Syria memasuki tanah mereka. tetapi ada dua negara yang tidak berpendirian sedemikian iaitu Iraq dan Lubnan. Iraq tidak berpendirian sedemikian kerana pemimpin Syria merupakan orang Syiah dan mereka selalu meminta pertolongan dari Iraq kerana Iraq merupakan negara Syiah.

3-Syeikh Yussuf Al-Qaradhawi telah mengeluarkan fatwa bahawa mereka yang terbunuh dalam keadaan yang sebegini adalah seorang yang SYAHID....

4-95% ulama Syria telah bersama dalam kebangkitan rakyat ini.

5-19% negara-negara Arab telah mewajibkan sekatan politik dan ekonomi ke atas Syria.


1- Gambaran tentang Syria agak tidak jelas bila dijelaskan oleh media2, kerana itu Syeikh Hassan dihantar bagi menjelaskan apakah sebenarnya yang berlaku di SYRIA..

2-Media2 barat sebenarnya tidak mahu manusia dunia tahu akan apakah sebenarnya yang berlaku di Syria. Lalu mereka telah memutarbelitkan fakta.

3-Syeikh Khalid Hasan bercerita, ketika beliau di Indonesia dan bertemu dengan seorang teman, teman itu berkata dia lihat di akhbar bahawa ramai orang menyokong Kerajaan Syria. TV Indonesia juga menyiarkan bahawa ramai yang menyokong Kerajaan Syria yang dipimpin oleh Basyar Al-Assad. Apa yang berlaku sebenarnya ialah, kerajaan telah mengumpulkan pegawai2nya supaya berkumpul dalam erti kata lain mahu menunjukkan kepada dunia bahawa Basyar Al-Assad ini mempunyai ramai yang menyokong beliau.

4-Jangan terpedaya dengan kenyataan2 yang kita dengar dari ahli intelektual Syria dan ahli politik Syria bahawa yang Syria menentang Israel. Tetapi, sejak zaman ayah Basyar Al-Assad lagi (Hafez Al-Assad) tidak satu peluru pun yang singgah ke tanah Israel. Bahkan Tanah Tinggi Golan yang terletak di Tanah Syria telah dikuasai oleh Israel.

5-Kita banyak tidak tahu tentang Isu Syria selama ini sebab media telah dikawal oleh pihak rejim Basyar Assad. Manakala sumber media lain tidak dibenarkan memasuki Syria untuk membuat liputan. Segala gambar dan video yang menjadi bahan bukti adalah hasil rakaman daripada para pendemonstrasi yang bertekad untuk merakam sendiri kezaliman tersebut dan kebanyakan daripada mereka telah menemui syahid. Sebahagian rakaman lain telah dijual oleh tentera rejim Basyar Assad dengan harga 100 dolar. Syeikh Dr Khalid Hassan Al-Hindawi merupakan delegasi khas Syeikh Dr Yussuf Al-Qaradhawi ke Asia Tenggara untuk menyampaikan dan menyebarkan berita sebenar.


-Mendoakan saudara kita di Syria

-Menghulurkan bantuan untuk mereka dari segi kewangan

-Menyebarkan berita sebenar tentang apa yang berlaku di SYRIA.

Ingatlah Saudaraku, Nabi SAW bersabda yang bermaksud:

"Barangsiapa yang tidak mengambil tahu hal orang Islam yang lain, maka bukan dari kalangan KAMI"

dan ingatlah selalu akan tempat kembali bagi mereka yang zalim:

Kalam Saidina Ali KWJ; "Sesungguhnya negeri yang batil itu sejkejap sahaj sedangkan negeri yang benar itu tetap sehingga datangnya kiamat".

Firman Allah Taala dalam Surah Al-Isra' ayat 81;

"Dan katakanlah :Telah datang kebenaran (Islam), dan hilang lenyaplah perkara yang salah (kufurdan syirik) ; sesungguhnya yang salah itu sememangnya satu perkara yang tetap lenyap".

Firman Allah dalam Surah Ar-Ra'd ayat 17 ; adapun buih itu maka akan hilang lenyaplah ia hanyut terbuang, manakala benda-benda yang berfaedah kepada manusia maka ia tetap tinggal di bumi. Demikianlah Allah menerangkan misal-misal perbandingan.

(Jzkk AKH Abu Abdullah)

(Disampaikan pada 6 Disember 2011 di Uni Putra Malaysia)


Please take your time for this =)